Bites for the Computer: Thirty Years of Digitization in Dentistry
Jef M van der Zel*
Department of Computerized Dentistry, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands
*Corresponding author: Jef M van der Zel, was professor of Endowed Chair in Computerized
Dentistry, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands, from 2004-2014. Tel: +31-620687031;
Email: email@example.comReceived date: 14 August 2020; Accepted date: 21 August 2020; Published date: 29 August 2020
Citation: Jef M van der Zel (2020). Bites for the Computer: Thirty Years of Digitization in Dentistry. SunText Rev Dental Sci 1(1): 103.
Copyright: © 2020 Jef M van der Zel.
By comparing the motivation of the pioneers with the new state of the art of digital dentistry, it gives a good picture of the type and extent of innovations and technological advancements in the last 30 years that have been of influence and whether dentistry was improved by progress and innovations, the breadth and their impact, disruptions and benefits that have or have not occurred and whether material scientists have seized all opportunities. Digitization has led to changes on many fronts and yielded new techniques, systems and interactions that have improved dentistry. Innovation has created opportunities for future research into new materials.
Due to digitization and the new state of the art, the patient experience has improved. More restoration options are possible with high durability and better aesthetics. New ways have been developed for effective and efficient interprofessional and clinical-patient interactions. New university curricula enable the training of students towards a new way of learning. Digital dentistry was initially seen as a threat to dental technicians, but this has turned out to be incorrect, so much so that no one doubts the positive contribution that the digitization of dentistry has made anymore. The question of whether 30 years of digitization has added value for dentistry is interesting, although it has permanently changed our way of working.
Keywords: CAD/CAM; Digital dentistry; Intra-oral scanner; Additive manufacturing; Virtual patient; Scaffold; Telecare; Dental materials; Chairside; Ceramics
The first steps towards the digitization of dentistry were published more than 46 years ago by the French dentist François Duret in 1973, in his thesis entitled “Empreinte optique” . In 1985 he produced the first acrylic crown with CAD/CAM at the congress of the ADF (Association Dentaire Française) . In the 1980s, several people began to take an interest in the subject, notably Matts Anderson, in Sweden, Werner Mörmann in Switzerland, Jef van der Zel in the Netherlands, Dianne Rekow, in the United States and Sadami Tsutsumi in Japan  . This new period was a
period of scientific and technical struggle between the pioneers, but also a time when all early actors were discovered, brought together and appreciated. The friendship of the united actors with Duret , Mörmann and Brandestini (CEREC™) , Rekow , Van der Zel (CICERO™) , Anderson (PROCERA™) , Tsutsumi and Fushita  has never been denied. The systems that were commercialized originated in existing companies, producing such as dental equipment, dental materials or implants. Due to a lack of venture capital, some systems got stuck in the prototype
stage. The earliest people shared that they had been fascinated from the start by the possibilities of the computer for automating the dental restorative process. The many mutual contacts in the early years resulted in an exchange of ideas, which can be regarded as a healthy curiosity. In the 1990s we see for the first time the emergence of many other systems, then the emergence of outsourced machining centers and finally market dominance by large groups (Siemens, NobelBiocare, Bego, Kavo, Girrbach, etc.). It should be noted here that it are European companies that
dominated the market. Then came the 2000s, with the rise of open. During this period, more and more systems came onto the market and the market continued to grow. In the beginning it was absolutely uncertain whether digital technologies would improve the quality and possibilities in research, diagnosis and treatment of the dental patient compared to conventional methods. It is also questionable whether such digital methods provide sufficient accuracy in data collection and assessment, improve efficiency in treatment planning, and improve treatment efficiency. The new developments in 3D engineering in comprehensive dentofacial rehabilitation will have to prove new possibilities and benefits in using a digital approach . We are now seeing how the three components of digital dentistry: digitization, design and production have further converged into standard applications.
The first commercially available CAD/CAM system was CEREC™, which enabled delivery of inlays and onlays in one
visit . Central manufacturing centers for the supply of alumina copings, PROCERA™ and for veneered two-layer crowns, CICERO™ were introduced at approximately the same time [8,5]. Together, these systems have catalyzed the evolution of new materials as well as the development of CAD/CAM and multiple new materials . The first forms of digital imaging included both an intraoral imaging system integral with the CEREC™ system, and CICERO™ a triangulation laboratory scanner integral with the CICERO™ system and evolutions in digital radiography. First introduced in the late 1980s, digital radiography has transformed the field and improved image quality, moving from phosphor plates to solid-state detectors, cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), and new generations of intraoral scanners. CBCT is a relatively young X-ray imaging technique within dentistry. The quality of the image reconstructions has improved significantly since its introduction. As a result, the application possibilities have also increased. Much attention is currently being paid to the diagnostic value of CBCT for various dental diagnostic questions . Three-dimensional visualization makes it possible to view the depicted object from different sides and to perceive it as a “virtual reality” object. Dentistry is changing with the imposition of digital systems that make almost everything in dentistry possible. Today’s digital systems are user and patient friendly, and versatile. Pioneering efforts of the early systems could only fabricate inlays and onlays or copings or single crowns. Now there seems to be no more limitation in the types of restorations that can be produced, ranging from simple inlays to digitally designed and manufactured complete dentures, orthodontic appliances, study models, implant related components and both simple and complex surgical guides . Introducing open architecture has redefined how and where data flows from design to fabrication, creating new networks .
When the World Wide Web was invented in 1989, now, just 30 years later, the transformation to artificial intelligence and advancements in neural networks is underway . Over the centuries, dentistry has survived and thrived despite all these changes. Care and longevity of the teeth and oral facial complex has been improved. Digital dentistry has changed the way dentists think and function. It has improved the patient experience and created a distributed workflow that can benefit from outsourcing various functions. In 2020, the majority of European restorations are outsourced in Asia. Large design studios in China are active in designing restorations overnight. Other digital applications and innovations are impacting dentistry technology-assisted health monitoring and care, telecare, artificial intelligence and innovation in student education. These changes are likely to have a greater impact on the future of dentistry than we currently realize. Telecare data from smart digital health devices can be exchanged between clinicians/healthcare providers. It is therefore not surprising that telecare is growing rapidly. Telecare enables patient care and remote communication both with patients and for consultation with other professionals and brings telecare to disadvantaged areas and to people who have difficulty traveling to healthcare facilities. With telecare, point-of-care options and diagnosis are further expanded. Other mobile systems integrate communication software with real-time active entry of clinical patient data. In dentistry, telecare is used for many conditions/situations. Patients and clinicians both find benefits in telecare.
Digital Patient Card
The digital patient card will be an important step towards an actual reversal of care chain. This may include information about the medical and dental treatments that have been performed and a dental health documented with X-rays. With this information in his pocket, the patient will more easily consult the information network with his care needs. A digital patient card offers benefits to all involved. Island solutions in dental care will run out.
Instead, administration, image processing and equipment will increasingly be integrated into a common practice system. Until now, overarching coordination of data and images has been prevented by systems. The development of an open communication standard and a digital patient card prevent duplication of data entry and the resulting errors. Due to the transition to digital archiving, the care process (all activities related to research and treatment of patients) will become increasingly dependent on ICT. Reliability, availability and continuity are paramount. The data that must always be available for the care process require solid and safe storage facilities.
Dentistry is becoming multi-track. The importance of special and new treatment methods will increase, and more and more practices will specialize. To this end, the need to provide information to critical patients is growing. A dental practice without visualizing patient information will therefore be clearly out of place. Dental laboratories will have to fundamentally adapt on a number of different fronts. They too will have to indicate what their well-developed and less well-developed qualities are. Laboratory owners who refuse to do so and want to maintain their entire traditional value chain in an integrated manner – either horizontally or vertically – are lost. They will be attacked via the networks not only on their core competence, but on several fronts simultaneously. Computer-aided outsourcing, especially to Asia, will increasingly play a role in the production of dental restorations. The cost savings it achieves now will only increase in the near future. Making optimum use of information networks means that it is possible to decide at any conceivable time which business process is the best for which provider at what time and at which price-quality ratio. In short: utilizing the information networks for its own competitive advantage. Computer-aided outsourcing is only possible if dental laboratories dare to share ,information about product systems, business processes and logistics with their business partners. Do I dare, can I, do I want that? In a nutshell, this is the dilemma that laboratory owners face today . Without the existence of the global information networks, the countries of the second and third world would have a reasonable chance to independently develop into regional powers of interest, albeit mainly as a follower and (cheap) supplier.
At present scanners, both intraoral and laboratory based, have informed restorative dentistry . Real-time imaging proves digital on-screen images of one or more teeth, whole arches, opposition arches, occlusion and surrounding soft tissue. With onscreen images explaining treatment options for patients is simplified. Patients appreciate the more comfortable data collection process. Space-saving plaster models are replaced by easy-to-archive digital files. Data can be played at any time for various reasons. It is now possible to scan one complete dental arch within minutes, without the need for a tooth coating. The recording in color is possible in half, but does not achieve the accuracy of a
color spectrometer . Scanners are on carts, are portable (in the hand/tablet) or are integrated in the dental chair. Most are wireless. Whereas the intraoral scanners used to be closed, most are now open communication with the different design stations. Accuracy and correctness between scanned data and reference data have been extensively studied. Results even with design only scanners show slight differences between intraoral scanned data, extraoral scan data and conventional impression/model data, although all are inside acceptable limits for clinical use [13-17].
Obviously, sharp angles, powder coating and long dental arch spans can affect accuracy . The scan pattern can affect accuracy  or not , depending on the case and which scanners were used. However, the major concern is whether or not the restorations produced from intraoral scan data have an equal quality as those produced by conventional impressions. Most studies show that there is no difference in the fit of the produced restorations by these two data acquisition approaches [18,19]. Digitally fabricated 3-piece ceramic substructures have a better fit than conventionally fabricated metal substructures . For the digitization to be successful it must drastically improve
the user-friendliness, efficiency and cost-effectiveness of dental care. The development of a multifunctional intra-oral dental scanner, which can scan the color of the tooth as well as the geometry of the preparation and its environment, directly in the mouth of the patient in the dental chair. It is one of the strategically most important goals of computer-aided dentistry because it represents the starting point for a computer-aided production of dental restorations – either chairside or by a central manufacturing center. This means that the patient can be provided with ceramic restorations quickly and comfortably, and sometimes in one appointment. The latter can easily compete with the handmade equivalents with the latest production technology in aesthetics. The intra-oral scanner puts the dentist in a position
where he is able to access the internet and ‘obtain’ the most favorable price-quality restoration for his patient.
Since the first CICERO™ triangulation scanner was shown at the IDS in 1992 , at least 20 laboratory scanners are now available, suitable for scanning plaster models or impressions. All of them have an accuracy of at least 15 µm and are widely used in the office laboratory workflow [21-23].
Integration of data from multiple sources along with improved user interface and CAD software capabilities opened important options. Software modules now include robust aesthetic enhancements including “smile” design, tooth shape libraries, color matching and denture placement. Other enrichments integrate tacking the jaw to improve and automate components of dynamic occlusion . Digital smile design integrates digital photos from facial and software analysis to help practitioners and laboratory technicians create and plan a course for treatment, a virtual simulation of the
final aesthetic result. This is especially valuable in complex, multidisciplinary restorations. It enables and facilitates
communication between clinicians and the laboratory. Importantly, it is also critical in pre-treatment discussions with
patients, involving them in choices that affect aesthetics and creating realistic expectations the patient has for treatment outcomes. Tooth and dentin shape libraries provide a common, smooth initial shape and proportions, making restoration design nearly automated and greatly accelerated [22-24].
Occlusion is a critical factor in restorative and antagonist design and longevity and patient satisfaction. Jaw dynamics captured by conebeam computed tomography (CBCT) or a scanner creates a virtual articulator. The full range of static and dynamic jaw movements and occlusion are recorded and can be integrated with smile design, computer-aided implantation planning and digital oral surgery planning. Unfortunately, integrating data from multiple sources is not yet completely seamless, requiring interactive transfer of files between systems and user interactions for superpositions [27,28]. Integration of functional occlusion using virtual articulation in CAD-CAM complete dental prosthetic rehabilitation is implemented in some CAD software . The emergence of high hardness monolithic zirconia restorations requires a test for dynamic fault contacts, before milling, given the difficulty in occlusal adjustments in the dental chair. Therefore, an exact digital record of static and dynamic maxillary-mandibular relationships is necessary. The CICERO articulation software detects disturbances occurring near the bucco-lingual transverse edge, which are not easily detected at the chair, but are easily incorporated into the design of the occlusal plane [29,30].
Workflow with CAD/CAM
While the functional components of data acquisition, design, and manufacturing have not changed with modern CAD/CAM systems, the choices in how work flows through the process have changed dramatically . Open architecture of digital systems created new opportunities. Instead of closed systems in which all functional components are incorporated in a CAD/CAM system, now functional components from different manufacturers can be
selected and linked by the user. This allows the processes for making restorations to be made to be distributed in order to best suit the interest, capabilities, and skills of those who contribute to the fabrication of dental components [31,32].
Augmented reality models in dentistry Dental care is hard to imagine without the help of the computer. While there are already many examples of computer applications in dentistry, such as digital X-ray systems, intraoral cameras and
colorimeters, electronic caries, pocket depth gauges and chewing registration systems, as well as interactive image processing and planning and CAD/CAM systems and digital patient file management, it still has did not lead to a real breakthrough of an integrated patient file. By integrating different structural components, such as the tooth library and the scanning and design software, with an open communication standard and central file management, a file can be developed for prosthetics, implantology and orthodontics. Practice management software enables recording of patient data, scheduling appointments, interacting with insurance companies, initiating and tracking billing, and generating reports. In parallel, electronic health records, a digital version of patient-centered clinically-oriented information, motivated changes in patient health tracking, facilitating quality of care assessments and data extraction for research, including evaluation of clinical efficacy and efficacy procedures . At the same time, other technologies are being influenced and enabled innovations in digital dentistry, often at a remarkable pace. These technologies include sensor miniaturization, artificial intelligence, augmented and virtual reality, 3D printing, telecare, interoperability, Internet of Things, nanotechnology, quantum computing, biomedical technology, data storage costs, connectivity and others. Many are technologies we never imagined and words we didn’t even know 20 years ago.
Augmented reality models for dentistry create a new, sometimes virtual reality. It is therefore important to consider to what extent the models and flow charts that serve as a basis correspond to the experience and context of dental practice. At best, the most skilled people in our field create the models and flow diagrams themselves or are closely involved in these before the systems are built. This has often been lacking so far. Many high-tech products
have emerged that do not fit well within the context of dental practice and therefore often end in isolated applications in a few clinics.
The Digital Virtual Patient
The integration of data from multiple digital technologies, including the new 5G network, extends the scope of what is
possible. The digital patient data is vital in computer-aided surgery/dynamic surgical navigation, robots performing dental procedures, CAD/CAM, and new approaches to restorations and tissue one-appointment technical scaffolds. Integration of facial data creates the digital patient from photographs or various 3D tracking devices, radiographic information, intraoral image data, as well as other digital data that may be appropriate (e.g., CBCT scans, etc.). Using the virtual patient as a platform, it enables development of a digital treatment plan, on-screen design and simulation of procedures such as design of restorations, surgical navigation for implant placement or craniofacial (and other) operations, and virtual models for teaching and communication with a . Creating the virtual patient reduces the number of errors that can be introduced using conventional approaches, shortens planning time and increases patient intuitiveness [33-35].
Additive manufacturing, also called 3D printing, is now a fully integrated option in CAM hardware, offering an alternative to subtractive machining (milling). The most unique factor in additive manufacturing is the flexibility of the design. A solid block no longer has to be the starting point for manufacturing. Instead, products are built layer by layer, allowing for a high degree of geometric complexity. Now that products can be produced with different internal geometries as well as the desired topographic geometry, it is not yet clear how this innovation in dental prosthesis design is capitalized in this case. Several 3D printing technologies are available, of which stereolithography (SLA) is the most widely used  Invisalign was one of the first to use 3D printed models with sequential tooth positions for which orthodontic aligners have been manufactured. Today, 3D printing can produce an exceptionally wide range of dental “components”, including everything from simple models, wax molds, tooth-colored temporary restorations and surgical molds, to more complex metal and ceramic restorations and digitally fabricated full dentures. Depending on the system, material choices include glass ceramic, cobalt chrome, composites, PMMA, resin/polymers, wax, titanium, zirconia, with more and more choices becoming available with new material innovations. The quality of 3D printed products is at least equivalent to that produced by more conventional methods [37,38]. Specific studies indicate that 3D printing of temporary crowns has a better fit , that drilling templates are accurate to 0.25° from planned implants , that occlusal splints have a similar polished surface and wear. Correctness of exterior surface, occlusion surface, marginal area and occlusal surface of 3D zirconia printed crowns was no worse than the corresponding milled crowns . Custom templates and craniofacial prostheses provide good aesthetics and a better fit than traditional methods. 3DP plays an essential role in diagnostics and treatment planning and in improving patient communication, skills training and oral surgery . Cheap printers can be a realistic alternative to inhouse production. It can produce clinically acceptable temporary crown and bridge restorations , full arch models and digital copies of orthodontic plaster models. This allows the creation of realistic models with sufficient dimensional integrity for various applications.
What 3D printing adds to digital dentistry is that it enables material innovations . Computer aided design and fabrication (CAD/CAM) of complete dentures is showing exponential growth in the dental market with the number of commercially available CAD/CAM prosthesis systems just growing. There is evidence to document improved physical properties of the CAD/CAM dentures as compared to conventionally manufactured ones; one of these features is adjustment of the prosthesis and an improved fit of the upper jaw. With CAD/CAM dentures they can be fabricated with slight compressibility of the tissue or no compressibility at all in the posterior sealed area.
The intraoral scanning devices have become more accurate and popular, so the intraoral scan, the so-called “digital impression” of implants is widely used. For the intra-oral scan of implants, there are many different ways to do this. Scannable attachments already included in the CAD/CAM software library can be easily recognized. On the basis of advanced technological developments, it is expected that computed tomography will gain in significance in dentistry. The development of X-ray detector arrays is currently enabling the recording of a full projection surface. This principle
is already used in Cone Beam CT scanners. With this so-called CBCT technique, specific solutions for dentistry can be built at a reasonable price, with which an accurate three-dimensional image of the jaws and the mid-facial area can be made with a very low radiation load. This creates the possibility of using CT scanning more widely in the future in design and planning in restorative and prosthetic dentistry. Data obtained by computed tomography (CBCT) and other digital imaging techniques combined with 3D printing have significantly influenced tissue engineering [44,45]. Transforming craniofacial reconstruction over the last two decades, this integration has opened new possibilities for complex craniofacial reconstruction through personalized scaffold constructions based on patient specific anatomical data . The biocompatibility, printability and mechanical properties of extrusion-based bio-ink printed scaffolds are well documented . The impact of digital dentistry on scaffolds and tissue engineering cannot be overlooked. It is undoubtedly a ripe area for materials science research.
One of the achievements of computer-aided dentistry is that it has enabled the use of high-strength zirconia ceramics. The introduction of this material in restorative and prosthetic dentistry will most likely be the decisive step towards metal-free allceramic without restrictions . The recent evolution in CAD/CAM technologies is breathtaking, enabling clinicians and dental technicians to fabricate indirect restorations in the laboratory or at the chair in the dental office from a variety of ceramic materials, from resin matrix ceramics to silica-based and highly strong ceramics such as lithium silicates and zirconia. However, it appears that some of these materials lack long-term scientific support and are used extensively with only a limited understanding of optical, physical and biological material properties. This pertains not only to material properties and fabrication parameters, but even more clinical applications such as cementation and resin binding protocols, which are critical to the success and survival of ceramic restorations. Until recently, aesthetics were one of the most important motives for choosing ceramics, but now the fabric-friendliness of the metal-free
ceramics has also been added. The patient has spoken out for biocompatibility. The paradigm that ceramic must always be prepared and modeled differently from metal ceramics has been eliminated with the advent of zirconia [47,48].
Digital color measurement using an intraoral scanner is an objective and predictable method for recording the color
distribution of a tooth. However, the digital color chart is currently not yet used by the dental technician to build up the
restoration manually in layers. In a literature review by Sailer et al. , for bridges on implants, conventionally veneered zirconia should not be considered a material selection of the first priority, due to the pronounced risk of breakage in bridges and porcelain chipping. Thanks to developments in veneering ceramics for zirconia and the use of strength control in the CAD design of zirconia substructures, these problems no longer occur . Monolithic zirconia, although it lacks the natural abrasion, reflection, color from within, of a restoration veneered by a porcelain layer, may be an interesting alternative, but the clinical results in the medium to long term have not yet been evaluated. Only with the PRIMERO™ CAD/CAM system , restorations with a zirconia substructure with dentin shape and a milled layer of chip-resistant translucent glassceramic are produced. For the computer-generated layer build-up, special dentin contour shape libraries – especially the anatomy of the dentin core – are designed with precise spatial definitions and determine the natural aesthetics of the restoration . The 2HUE™ tooth shade model for these restorations is based on research into the effect of the thickness of enamel on the degree of masking of the internal dentin color . Whether these advanced cognitive designed CAD/CAM restorations will gain market share will depend on the vision and imagination of investors and major market players.
In medical technology, there are ICT developments that are far ahead of what is currently happening in dentistry, but the latter is well on its way to catching up. We can learn a lot from this through careful analysis, with a lot of attention to the question of what dentistry really needs. We will have to validate every computer application and see how the ease of use of these computer systems can be improved and how they can be integrated into the context of dental care. Acceptance, “choosing the computer”, will certainly not be easy in the rather traditional field of dentistry. However, the signs are already there. There is a need to discuss future models for the user-friendly, efficient and cost-effective deployment of computer applications in dental care. The contemporary resources, time and knowledge, are a highly interesting breeding ground for a lot of innovative research.
In education, digital dentistry focuses on the application of computer techniques and on arriving at new treatment methods and material choices through independent analysis. Furthermore, a solid basic knowledge of available computer techniques in the dental practice will receive attention. A practical computer-aided techniques will fulfill an important educational function in the scientific training. Digital haptic and simulation systems have become important tools for teaching dental skills. The real-time feedback through tactile sensation has been applied to carious tissue locating and injection technique, teaching insight into dynamic occlusion , locating cephalometric landmarks , and drilling for implant placement . While schools grapple with a declining number of instructors, haptic systems are becoming more valuable by reducing faculty supervision demands. While valuable, learning is best optimized through a combination of instructor and virtual reality feedback, rather than one replacing the other.
After more applications of the digital approach appeared on the market, research into the reproducibility, accuracy and
correctness of the technology, which is based on point clouds, voxels and pixels, was desired. In 2002 an initiative of the Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam, a technical committee ISO/TC106/SC 9 Dental CAD/CAM systems was set up within the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) with approximately 30 members from 14 countries, to initiate the production of an international standard in CAD/CAM, which eventually got its focus on the accuracy of scanners. . The work has resulted in the standard 12836:2015 Dentistry, which specifies test methods for assessing the accuracy of digitizing equipment for computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) systems for indirect dental restorations .
The ambitions of the pioneers in the late 1980s eventually led to a form of implementation, which they too could not have dreamed of. Digital systems have penetrated our personal and professional life. In dentistry, an essential digital dataset of patient records, Xrays, photographs and intraoral scans, the platform represents revolutionary clinical activities that enrich patient-dentist and interprofessional interactions, transform education, and improve practice management. Digitization has led to changes on many fronts and yielded new techniques, systems and interactions that have improved dentistry. Innovation has created opportunities for future research by materials scientists. More restorative options are available for better durability and aesthetics. New approaches are to bring more efficiency and accuracy, using the interests, capacities and skills of those involved. New university curricula enable the training of students towards a new way of learning. Digital dentistry was initially seen as a threat to dental technicians, but this has turned out to be wrong, so much so that no one doubts the positive contribution that the digitization of dentistry has made so far. The question of whether 30 years of digitization has added value for dentistry is interesting, although it has permanently changed our way of working.
1. Duret F. Empreinte optique, in Faculte Dondontologie. University Claude Bernard. Lyon. 1973; 400.
2. Duret F. http://francoisduret.com/accueil/.
3. Van der Zel JM. Kiezen voor de computer. Oratie uitgesproken bij de aanvaarding van het ambt van bijzonder hoogleraar computerondersteunde tandheelkunde aan de Faculties der Tandheelkunde van de University van Amsterdam. 2004: 5-20.
4. Mormann WH, Brandestini M, Lutz F. The Cerec system: computer-assisted preparation of direct ceramic inlays in 1 setting. Quintessenz. 1987; 38: 457-470.
5. Van der Zel JM. CAD/CAM productive van kronen en bruggen, VLHT Nieuwsbrief Special. 1989; 9:4.
6. Tsutsumi S, Fukuda S, Tani Y. 3-D image measurements of teeth and alveolar ridge. JDR. 1989; 68: 924.
7. Rekow ED. Computer aided design and manufacturing in dentistry. J Prosth Dent. 1987; 58: 512.
8. Andersson M, Carlsson L, Persson M, Bergman B. Accuracy of machine milling and spark erosion with a CAD/CAM system. J Prosthet Dent. 1996; 76: 187-193.
9. Rekow D. CAD/CAM systems: a paradigm shift in restorations design and production. In: Rekow D, editor. Digital dentistry: a comprehensive reference and preview of the future surrey. UK. 2018.
10. Van der Stelt PF. Conebeam computertomografie: is meer ook beter. Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd. 2016; 123: 189-198.
11. Blatz MB, Conejo J. The current state of chairside digital dentistry and materials. Dent Clin North Am. 2019; 63: 175-197.
12. Kirschneck C, Kamuf B, Putsch C, Chhatwani S, Bizhang M, Danesh G, et al. Conformity, reliability and validity of digital dental models created by clinical intraoral scanning and extra oral plaster model digitization workflows. Comput Biol Med. 2018; 100: 114-122.
13. Lee KM. Comparison of two intraoral scanners based on threedimensional surface analysis. Prog Orthod. 2018; 19: 6.
14. Mennito AS, Evans ZP, Nash J, Bocklet C, Kelly AL, Bacro T, et al. Evaluation of the trueness and precision of complete arch digital impressions on a human maxilla using seven different intraoral digital impression systems and a laboratory scanner. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019; 31: 369-377.
15. Sason GK, Mistry G, Tabassum R, Shetty O. A comparative evaluation of intraoral and extra oral digital impressions: an in vivo study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2018; 18: 108-16.
16. Kim RJ, Park JM, Shim JS. Accuracy of 9 intraoral scanners for complete-arch image acquisition: a qualitative and quantitative evaluation. J Prosthet Dent. 2018; 120: 895-903.
17. Rodiger M, Heinitz A, Burgers R, Rinke S. Fitting accuracy of zirconia single crowns produced via digital and conventional impressions – a clinical comparative study. Clin Oral Investing. 2017; 21: 579-587.
18. Juntavee N, Sirisathit I. Internal accuracy of digitally fabricated cross-arch yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystalline prosthesis. Clin Cosmet Investing Dent. 2018; 10: 129-140.
19. Zel VDJM. Ceramic-fused-to-metal restorations with a new CAD/CAM system. Quintessence Int. 1993; 24: 769-778.
20. Benic GI, Sailer I, Zeltner M, Gutermann JN, Ozcan M, Muhlemann S, et al. Randomized controlled clinical trial of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of zirconia-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Part III: marginal and internal fit. J Prosthet Dent. 2019; 121: 426-431.
21. Mandelli F, Gherlone E, Gastaldi G, Ferrari M. Evaluation of the accuracy of extra oral laboratory scanners with a single-tooth abutment model: a 3D analysis. J Prosthodont Res. 2017; 61: 363-370.
22. Peng L, Chen L, Harris BT, Bhandari B, Morton D, Lin WS, et al. Accuracy and reproducibility of virtual edentulous casts created by laboratory impression scan protocols. J Prosthet Dent. 2018; 120:389-395.
23. Ueno D, Kobayashi M, Tanaka K, Watanabe T, Nakamura T, Ueda K, et al. Measurement accuracy of alveolar soft tissue contour using a laboratory laser scanner. Odontol. 2018; 106: 202-207.
24. Charavet C, Bernard JC, Gaillard C, Le Gall M. Benefits of digital smile design. J Conserv Dent. 2018; 21: 573–579.
25. Garcia PP, da Costa RG, Calgaro M, Ritter AV, Correr GM, da Cunha LF, et al. Digital smile design and mock-up technique for esthetic treatment planning with porcelain laminate veneers. J
Conserv Dent. 2018; 21: 455-458.
26. Lin WS, Harris BT, Phasuk K, Llop DR, Morton D. Integrating a facial scan, virtual smile design, and 3D virtual patient for treatment with CAD-CAM ceramic veneers: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent.
2018; 119: 200-205.
Jef M van der Zel, SunText Rev Dental Sci (2020), 1:1 Citation: Jef M van der Zel (2020). Bites for the Computer: Thirty Years of Digitization in Dentistry. SunText Rev Dental Sci 1(1): 103.
27. Kwon JH, Im S, Chang M, Kim JE, Shim JS. A digital approach to dynamic jaw tracking using a target tracking system and a structured-light three-dimensional scanner. J Prosthodont Res. 2019; 63: 115-119.
28. Lepidi L, Chen Z, Ravida A, Lan T, Wang HL, Li J, et al. A fulldigital technique to mount a maxillary arch scan on a virtual articulator. J Prosthodont. 2019; 4: 211-217.
29. Olthoff LW, Van der Zel JM, Bosman F. Effect of condylar jaw movements on the occlusal contacts of CICERO CAD/CAM crowns. J Dent Res. 1999; 78: 137.
30. Olthoff LW, Van der Zel JM, De Ruiter WJ, Vlaar ST, Bosman F. Computer modelling of occlusal surfaces of posterior teeth with the CICERO CAD/CAM system. J Prosth Dent. 2000; 84: 154-162.
31. Muhlemann S, Benic GI, Fehmer V, Hammerle CHF, Sailer I. Randomized controlled clinical trial of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of zirconia-ceramic posterior fixed partial dentures. Part II: time efficiency of CAD-CAM versus conventional laboratory procedures. J Prosthet Dent. 2019; 121:252-257.
32. Sailer I, Benic GI, Fehmer V, Hammerle CHF, Muhlemann S. Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part II: CAD-CAM versus conventional laboratory procedures. J Prosthet Dent. 2017; 118: 43-48.
33. Mangano C, Luongo F, Migliario M, Mortellaro C, Mangano FG. Combining intraoral scans, cone beam computed tomography and face scans: the virtual patient. J Craniofac Surg. 2018; 29: 2241-2246.
34. Morton D, Phasuk K, Polido WD, Lin WS. Consideration for contemporary implant surgery. Dent Clin North Am. 2019; 63: 309-329.
35. Vandenberghe B. The digital patient – imaging science in dentistry. J Dent. 2018; 74: 21-26.
36. Galante R, Figueiredo-Pina CG, Serro AP. Additive manufacturing of ceramics for dental applications: a review. Dent Mater. 2019; 35:825-846.
37. Revilla-Leon M, Meyer MJ, Ozcan M. Metal additive manufacturing technologies: literature review of current status and prosthodontic applications. Int J Comput Dent. 2019; 22: 55-67.
38. Bae EJ, Jeong ID, Kim WC, Kim JH. A comparative study of additive and subtractive manufacturing for dental restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2017; 118: 187-193.
39. Eftekhar AR, Nasiri Khanlar L, Mahshid M, Moshaverinia A. Comparison of dimensional accuracy of conventionally and digitally manufactured intracoronal restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2018; 119: 33-238.
40. Neumeister A, Schulz L, Glodecki C. Investigations on the accuracy of 3D-printed drill guides for dental implantology. Int J Comput Dent. 2017; 20: 35-51.
41. Wang W, Yu H, Liu Y, Jiang X, Gao B. Trueness analysis of zirconia crowns fabricated with 3-dimensional printing. J Prosthet Dent. 2019; 121: 285-291.
42. Moser N, Santander P, Quast A. From 3D imaging to 3D printing in dentistry – a practical guide. Int J Comput Dent. 2018; 21: 345-356.
43. Tahayeri A, Morgan M, Fugolin AP, Bompolaki D, Athirasala A, Pfeifer CS, et al. 3D printed versus conventionally cured provisional crown and bridge dental materials. Dent Mater. 2018; 34: 192-200.
44. Ma Y, Xie L, Yang B, Tian W. Three-dimensional printing biotechnology for the regeneration of the tooth and tooth-supporting tissues. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2019; 116: 452-468.
45. Yu N, Nguyen T, Cho YD, Kavanagh NM, Ghassib I, Giannobile WV. Personalized scaffolding technologies for alveolar bone regenerative medicine. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2019; 22: 69-75.
46. You F, Eames BF, Chen X. Application of extrusion-based hydrogel bioprinting for cartilage tissue engineering. Int J Mol Sci. 2017; 11:18.
47. Zhang Y, Kelly JR. Dental ceramics for restoration and metal veneering. Dental Clinics North Am. 2017; 61: 797-819.
48. Rosentritt ME. A focus on zirconia: an in-vitro lifetime prediction of zirconia dental restorations. PhD thesis Universiteit Amsterdam 2008; 64-77.
49. Sailer I, Strasding M, Valente NA, Zwahlen M, Liu S, Pjetturson BE. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic multiple-unit fixed dental prostheses. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2018; 29: 184-198.
50. Van der Zel JM. Primero: Six years of high-performance: Cognitive production of crowns and bridges. Int J Dent Oral Health. 2018; 4:135-139.
51. Van der Zel JM. High-Strength Porcelain Veneering of Zirconia Prosthetic Mimetic Restorations (PRIMERO) by Cognitive Design and Manufacturing. J Dents Dent Med. 2019; 2: 1-4.
52. Vlaar S, De Ruiter WJ, Van der Zel SJJ, Van der Zel JM. Farbkontrolle bei der digitalen Verblendung. Digital Dental News.2011; 21: 36-42.
53. Medellin-Castillo HI, Govea-Valladares EH, Perez-Guerrero CN, Gil-Valladares J, Lim T, Ritchie JM. The evaluation of a novel haptic-enabled virtual reality approach for computer-aided cephalometry. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2016; 130: 46-53.
54. Chen X, Sun P, Liao D. A patient-specific haptic drilling simulator based on virtual reality for dental implant surgery. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2018; 13: 1861-1870.
55. Vlaar ST. Validation procedures in computerized dentistry. 2012;156.
56. ISO 12836:2015 Dentistry – Digitizing devices for CAD/CAM systems for indirect dental restorations – Test methods for assessing accuracy. 2015.